Extension of limitation period due to fraud

Ans: .

Fraud: 

A mere threat used against the applicant is not a sufficient cause for the delay in filing the application.

According to section 17 of limitation act, 1963, when an appeal filed in a representative suit was returned for some corrections but was fraudulently not represented by the appellants and the persons represented applied that they should be allowed to prosecute the appeal, it was held that the application must be regarded as a fresh appeal and that the delay should be excused. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Q: Elaborate the citation of UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS V. SUJATHA VEDACHALAM (SMT) AND ANOTHER, 2000 ?

Ans: UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS V. SUJATHA VEDACHALAM (SMT) AND ANOTHER, 2000 The respondent in CA No. 6423 of 1998 was working as a Senior Accountant in the pay scale of Rs. 1400-2600 in the Office of the Accountant General, Maharashtra at Nagpur and was drawing a pay of Rs. 1260 per month. Subsequently for personal reasons the respondent sought transfer to the Office of the Accountant General, Karnataka at Bangalore. Her request for transfer was accepted on certain terms and conditions stipulated by the appellants and the same were accepted by the respondents. One of the conditions of the transfer was that the respondent had to technically resign from the post which she was holding and she was to join as direct recruit to a lower post of Clerk in the pay scale of Rs. 950-1500. On acceptance of the terms and conditions the respondent was transferred as a Clerk to the Office of the Accountant General, Karnataka at Bangalore. After the transfer to a lower post, her pay was erroneously fi...
Read more